《高尔夫球规则》是由苏格兰圣安德鲁斯皇家古老高尔夫球俱乐部及美国高尔夫球协会审定，世界通用的最权威职业和业余选手之行为规范用书。当比赛进行时，每位选手皆负有使比赛公平公正之责任。

　　熟知高尔夫球规则，你将拥有更多的高尔夫乐趣、健康、友谊及尊重。“每日规则解答”将使您更为深入的了解高尔夫球规则。

　　Q: A competitor’s ball comes to rest in an area that he feels should be marked as ground under repair. Believing the Committee might declare the area to be ground under repair, he announces that he will invoke Rule 3-3 and play a second ball in accordance with Rule 25-1b and that he wishes his score with the ball played under Rule 25-1b to count if the Rules permit. He marks the position of and lifts the original ball, drops it in accordance with Rule 25-1b and plays it. He then places a second ball where the original lay and plays it. Is the competitor’s procedure correct?

　　A: Yes. Rule 3-3 does not require the original ball to be played as it lies and, therefore, the competitor’s procedure was acceptable. However, it would also have been correct for the competitor to play his original ball as it lay and play a second ball in accordance with Rule 25-1b.

　　问：一名比赛者的球停了下来，他感觉球停的这个地方应该被标记为维修中的地面。这名比赛者相信委员会已经宣布过这里是维修中的地面，于是他调用规则3-3，并按照规则25-1b的规定，打了第二个球，他希望如果规则允许，他的成绩可以按规则25-1b打出的球记。他标记了球原来的位置，然后捡起原来的球，按规则25-1b抛球并打球。然后，他又把第二个球放在原来的位置并抛球。这名球员的处置程序正确吗？

　　答：对。规则3-3没有要求球员按原来球的位置打球，因此，比赛者的程序可以被接受。然而，比赛者按照球原来的位置打或者按照规则25-1b的规定打第二个球也是正确的。

　　（为避免产生歧义，请以英文原文为准。）
　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　      （golftime·陈艳编译）